The time stamp for Chapter 23 is labeled "0500 hours, July 18, 2552", even though the events portrayed take place after the preceding chapters which occurred over the evening of July 18 the previous chapter begins at 2010 hours that day.Despite this she is later said to tap her lip in thought. Halsey and the Spartans are on a Pelican leaving the Damascus Testing Facility, Halsey tries to adjust her glasses but can't due to her space helmet. Throughout the rest of the book, Eridanus II is correctly referenced as being located in the similarly named Eridanus system. The Eridanus II space dock is erroneously stated to be located in the Epsilon Eridani system in the chapter heading for Chapter 10.Halo: The Fall of Reach Main article: Halo: The Fall of Reach Internal Conflicts which are persistent throughout multiple sources are listed in the "Several sources" section. For example, conflicting information in Halo: The Fall of Reach is said to contradict Halo: Combat Evolved, even though the novel was released slightly earlier than the game. games and their marketing material), the "primary" work takes precedence on this list even if released marginally later than the "secondary" one. In instances in which two or more works have been developed concurrently and released within a short span of time of one another ( e.g. 1.38 Halo: Fractures: Extraordinary Tales from the Halo Canon.1.35 Halo: The Fall of Reach - The Animated Series.1.15.6 The Impossible Life and the Possible Death of Preston J.1.15 Halo: Evolutions - Essential Tales of the Halo Universe.If you think you can explain an inconsistency, do so here, on this article's talk page. Many inconsistencies on this page are provided possible explanations, although it should be noted that these are only unofficial theories unless otherwise stated, and may not reflect the franchise developers' stance on the matters in question. For inconsistencies that have since been resolved by other Halo media, see List of rectified inconsistencies in the Halo series. There have been a number of cases in which an apparent inconsistency arises within an individual piece of media, only to receive a canonical workaround in another source an example of this is the shared designation "Type-47 Scarab" for the two different Scarab models appearing in Halo 2 and Halo 3, something that was eventually clarified as "a UNSC administration quirk". Likewise, it can rarely be conclusively determined whether a conflict is the result of an oversight on part of the author or editor(s) or an intentional retcon, unless this is specifically confirmed by the developers of the Halo franchise such cases are noted accordingly. It is often difficult to decide which resource is "superior" to another, so conflicts are mostly listed in a chronological order. Internal inconsistencies refer to discrepancies which occur within a single source, while external inconsistencies are conflicts between two or more sources. Inconsistencies on the list are divided into two types: internal and external. This list is compiled to show the various discrepancies spotted in the Halo universe. Science Team Leader: " Combined science team analysis gives us considerable conviction that the related events are credible." ONI Commander: " But they contradict everything we know about the Didact! The terminal dialogs-" Science Team Leader: " The terminal dialogs may themselves be questionable, in light of this new testimony." ONI Commander: " I lodge my strong suspicion." - An in-universe acknowledgment of the conflicts between the Halo 3 terminals and The Forerunner Saga.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |